References
Last update: March 4, 2003
Abraham, R.~H. and Shaw, C.~D. (1984).
Dynamics---the
Geometry of Behavior, Books 0 - 4.
Aerial
Press, Inc.,
Volume
1 of the Visual Mathematics Library.
Ainsworth-Darnell,
K., Shulman, H., and Boland, J.~E. (1998).
Dissociating
brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies:
Evidence
from event-related potentials.
{\em Journal of Memory and Language}, 38:112--130.
Blum,
L., Shub, M. & Smale, S.
(1989). On a theory of
computation and complexity
over the real numbers:
NP-completeness,
recursive functions, and universal machines.
Bulletin
of the American Mathematical Society, 21(1): 1—45.
Syntactic
persistence in language production.
{\em Cognitive Psychology}, 18:355--87.
Bock, K.
and Cutting, J.~C. (1992).
Regulating
mental energy: Performance units in language production.
{\em Journal of Memory and Language}, 31:99--127.
Bock,
K. and Eberhard, K.~M. (1993).
Meaning,
sound, and syntax in {English} number agreement.
{\em Language and Cognitive Processes}, 8(1):57--99.
Bock, K. and Loebell (1990).
Framing sentences. Cognition 35, 1-39.
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M.
J., Stewart, A. J. (ms). Syntactic priming of ambiguous sentences in language
comprehension. Manuscript,
Branigan, H.P., Pickering, M.J., Liversedge,
S.P., Stewart, A.J., and
Urbach, T.P. (1995).
Syntactic priming: Investigating the mental representation of
language. Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research, 24:489--506.
Burgess, C. & Lund, K. (1997).
Modeling parsing constraints with a high-dimensional context
space. Language and Cognitive
Processes, 12(2/3), 177--210.
Chambers,
C.G., Tanenhaus, M.K., Eberhard,
K.M., Carlson, G.N. & Filip, H. (1998). Words and worlds:
the construction of context for definite reference. In M.A. Gernsbacher
& S.J. Derry (Eds.) Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the
Cognitive Science Society (pp. 220-225).
Chambers, C.G.,
& Smyth, R. (1998). Structural
parallelism and discourse coherence: a test of centering theory. Journal of
Memory and Language,
39, 593-608.
Chan,
T.-C.
and Shaw, R.~E. (1996).
What is
ecological psychology?
{\em Psychologia}.
{\em Statistical Language Learning}.
MIT
Press,
Chomsky,
N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. Mouton and Co.,
Christiansen,
M.~H. and Chater, N. (in
press).
Toward
a connectionist model of recursion in human linguistic performance.
Cognitive Science.
Christiansen,
M.H. & Chater, N. (submitted). Constituency and Recursion
in Connectionist Networks.
Clark,
H. (1996). Using Language.
Cole, P.
(1981). Radical
Pragmatics.
Cottrell,
G.~W. (1985a).
{\em A connectionist approach to word
sense disambiguation (Tech Rep.
No.
154)}.
Revised
version published 1989 in the Pitman Publishers Research
Notes
in Artificial Intelligence Series.
Cottrell,
G.~W. (1985b).
Connectionist
parsing.
In {\em Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Conference of the
Cognitive
Science
Society}, pages 201--11. { }.
Cottrell,
G.~W. and Small, S. (1984).
Viewing
parsing as word sense discrimination: A connectionist
approach. In Bara, B. and Guida, G., editors, {\em
Computational Models of
Natural
Language Processing}, pages 91--119. North Holland,
Good
Natured.
The
Marked Effect of Number on Subject-Verb Agreement.
Journal
of Memory and Language,
Eberhard, K.,
Spivey-Knowlton, M., Sedivy, J., and Tanenhaus, M. (1995).
Eye
movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural
contexts.
Journal of
Psycholinguistic Research, 24:6, 409-436.
Edward, H. K. S.
& Wan, C. L. (1999). How To Design A Connectionist Holistic Parser. Neural Computation, 11(8).
van Eijck, J & Kamp, H. (1996). Representing Discourse in Context. In J. van Benthem
& A. ter Meulen (eds.)
Handbook of Logic and Linguistics. Elsevier. Online
version.
Elman, J.~L. (1990). Finding structure in time.
Cognitive Science, 14:179--211.
Distributed
representations, simple recurrent networks, and
grammatical structure. Machine Learning, 7:195--225.
Elman, J. L. (1995). Language as a dynamical system. In
Ferreira, F. &
Clifton, C. (1986). The independence of
syntactic processing. Journal of
Memory and Language, 25: 348-368.
Precis of the modularity
of mind.
{\em Behavioral and Brain Sciences}, 8:1--5.
Fodor, J. and
McLaughlin, B.P. (1990).
Connectionism
and the problem of systematicity: Why Smolensky's solution doesn't work.
Cognition, 35:183-204.
Fodor, J.~A. (1983).
{\em Modularity of Mind}.
MIT
Press,
Fodor,
J.~A., Bever, T.~G., and Garrett, M.~F.
(1974)
{\em The Psychology of Language}.
@BOOK{Fromkin88:aitl,
AUTHOR =
"Victoria Fromkin and Robert Rodman",
TITLE =
"An Introduction to Language",
PUBLISHER =
"Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.",
YEAR =
"1988",
address = "
}
Frazier
and Fodor, L. F. . J.~D.
(1978).
The
sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model.
{\em Cognition}, (6):291--325.
Ford, M.,
Bresnan, J.~W., and Kaplan, R. (1982).
A
competence-based theory of syntactic closure.
In
Bresnan, J.~W., editor, {\em
The mental representation of
grammatical relations},
page~{}. MIT Press,
Frazier,
L. (1978).
On
comprehending sentences: syntactic parsing strategies.
Unpublished
doctoral dissertation,
Frazier, L. and Rayner, K. (1982).
Making and
correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye
movements in the analysis of
structurally ambiguous sentences.
{\em Cognitive Psychology}, 14:178--210.
{\em Escape from Freedom}. Holt, Reinhart,
and
{\em Journal of Experimental Psychology}, 6(1):110-125.
Garnsey, S., Pearlmutter, N., Myers, and Lotocky
(1997).
The
contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension
of temporarily
ambiguous sentences.
{\em Journal of Memory and Language}, 37:58--93.
Garnsey, S.~M. (1993).
Event-rela ted brain potentials in the
study of language: An
introduction.
{\em Language and Cognitive Processes}, 8:337--356.
Linguistic
complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition.
68(1):
1-76.
Gibson, E.
(To appear).
{\em Memory Limitations and Sentence Processing Breakdown}.
MIT Press,
Gibson, J.~J. (1982). Reasons
for Realism: Selected Essays of James J. Gibson.
Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Gorrell, P. (1995). Syntax and parsing.
Grice,
H. P. (1981). Presupposition
and conversational implicature. In Cole, ed. Radical
Pragmatics.
Haiman, J. (1985).
{\em Natural Syntax: Iconicity and Erosion}.
Han,
S. (1952). A Many-Splendored
Thing. Signet,
Hopper, P.
(1996).
"The
current state of grammaticalization research".
Hopper,
P.~J. and Traugott, E.~C. (1993).
{\em Grammaticalization}.
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Precis of: Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning,
Grammar,
Evolution. To appear in Brain and
Behavioral Sciences. Available at:
http://maillist.cogpsyphy.hu/pipermail/koglist/2002-November/001768.html
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning,
Grammar,
Evolution.
Juliano, C. and Tanenhaus, M.K. (1994).
A
Constraint-Based Lexicalist Account of the
Subject/Object Attachment Preference.
Journal
of Psycholinguistic Research, 23(6):459-471.
Jurafsky, D. (1996).
A
probabilistic model of lexical and syntactic access and
disambiguation. {\em Cognitive Science}.
Jurafsky, D. and Martin, J. (in preparation).
Speech
and language processing.
Draft
version available at http://www.cs.colorado.edu/~martin/slp.html.
Kamp, H. and Reyle, U. (1993). From
Discourse to Logic: Introduction to
Model-Theoretic
Semantics
of Natural Language, Formal Logic, and Discourse Representation Theory.
Katz, J.~J. and M.Postal, P. (1964).
{\em An integrated theory of
linguistic descriptions}.
MIT
Press,
Kawamoto,
A.~H. (1993).
Nonlinear
dynamics in the resolution of lexical ambiguity: A parallel
distributed processing
account. {\em Journal of Memory and
Language}, 32:474--516.
Kempen, G. and Vosse, T. (1989).
Incremental
syntactic tree formation in human sentence processing: a
cognitive architecture based
on activation decay and simulated annealing.
{\em Connection Science}, 1:273--290.
{\em Phonology in Generative Grammar}.
Blackwell,
King, J. and Just,
M.A. (1991).
Individual
differences in syntactic processing: the role of working memory.
Journal
of Memory and Language 30:580-602.
Kiparsky, P. (1982).
Lexical
morphology and phonology.
In of~
pages 3--91. Hanshin
Publishing Co.
Kozen, Dexter (1997). Automata and Computability.
Landauer, T.K. & Dumais, S.T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent
semantic analysis
theory of acquisition, induction, and
representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104,
211--240.
Lendaris (1964).
On the Definition of Self-Organizing Systems. Proceedings of the
IEEE, March, 1964. Available at: http://www.sysc.pdx.edu/download/papers/DefineSOsys.364.pdf
Interference
in short-term memory: The magical number two (or three)
in sentence
processing. {\em Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research}, 25(1): 93-115.
Lewis,
R. & Vasishth, S. (2005). An
Activation-Based Model of Sentence Processing
as Skilled Memory
Retrieval. Cognitive Science, 29:
375-419.
Levinson, S.
(1983). Pragmatics.
MacDonald,
M.~A., Pearlmutter, N.~J.,
and Seidenberg, M.~S. (1994).
The
lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution.
{\em Psychological Review}, 101:676--703.
MacDonald, M.C. & Christiansen, M.H. (in
press). Reassessing working
memory: A comment on Just & Carpenter and
Waters & Caplan.
Psychological
Review.
McClelland, J.~L. and Elman, J.~L.
(1986a).
The
trace model of speech perception.
{\em Cognitive Psychology}, 18:1--86.
McClelland,
J. L. and Elman, J. L. (1986b)
Interactive
Processes in Speech Perception: The TRACE Model.
In
McClelland, J. L. and Rumelhart, D. E., eds., Parallel
Distributed Processing,
Volume 2. MIT Press,
McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart,
D., and Hinton, G. (1986)
The Appeal
of Parallel Distributed Processing.
In Rumelhart, D. E., and McClelland, J. L., eds., Parallel
Distributed Processing,
Volume 1. MIT Press,
McClelland, J.
L. & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive
activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1.
An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375-407.
McElree, B. and Griffith, T. (1995).
Syntactic
and thematic processing in sentence comprehension: Evidence
for a temporal
dissociation.
{\em Journal of Experimental Psychology: Language, Memory,
and
Cognition},
21(1):134--157.
McElree, B. and Griffith, T. (1998).
Structural
and Lexical Constraints on Filling Gaps during Sentence
comprehension: A Time-Course
Analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Language,
Memory, and Cognition, 24(2):432--460.
McRae, K.,
Spivey-Knowlton, M.J., and Tanenhaus, M.K. (1998).
Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other
constraints) in
online sentence comprehension. Journal
of Memory and Language. 38: 283-312.
McRoy,
B. W. and Hirst, G. (1990).Race-based
parsing and syntactic disambiguation. Cognitive Science, 14:313-353.
Moore,
Cris (1998). Dynamical
Recognizers: Real-time Language Recognition by Analog Computers. Theoretical Computer Science 201 (1998)
99-136.
Ni,
W. & Shankweiler, D. (1995). Difficulties in on-line
processing of relative clause structures. Platform paper presented at
Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting, January 6-9,
Ni, W., Shankweiler, D. & Crain, S. (1995). Syntactic complexity and working memory in
explaining comprehension difficulties. Poster paper presented at Academy of Aphasia 33rd Annual
Meeting, November 5-7, San Diego, CA. Brain and Language, 51 (1), 101-103.
Ni,
W., Crain, S. & Shankweiler, D. (1996a).
Sidestepping garden paths: Assessing the contributions of syntax, semantics and
plausibility in resolving ambiguities. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11
(3), 283-334.
Ni, W., Shankweiler, D., & Crain, S. (1996b). Individual differences in working memory and
eye-movement patterns in reading relative clause structures. In K. Matsuoka and A. Halbert
(Eds.) University of
Ni,
W., Shankweiler, D., Harris, K. S., & Fulbright,
R. (1997). Production and
comprehension of relative clause syntax in nonfluent
aphasia: A coordinated study. Poster paper presented at
Ni, W., Fodor, J. D., Crain, S. & Shankweiler, D.
(1998). Anomaly detection:
Eye-movement patterns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27,
515-539.
Ni,
W., Constable, R.T., Mencl, W.E., Pugh, K.,
Fulbright, R., Shaywitz, S., Shaywitz,
B., Gore, J. & Shankweiler, D. (2000). An event-related neuroimaging study distinguishing form and content in
sentence processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12.1,
120-133.
Norris,
D., McQueen, J. M., Cutler, A. (in press). Merging Information In
Speech Recognition: Feedback Is Never Necessary. Brain and
Behavioral Sciences.
Osterhout, L. and Holcomb, P.~J. (1993).
Event-related
potentials and syntactic anomaly: Evidence for anomaly
detection during the
perception of continuous speech.
{\em Language and Cognitive Processes}, 8:413--437.
Penrose,
Roger (1989). The Emperor’s New Mind: Concerning Computers,
Minds, and the Laws of Physics.
Plaut, David C. and James L.
McClelland and Mark S. Seidenberg and Karalyn E.
Patterson (1996).
Understanding Normal and Impaired
Word
Psychological
Review, v. 103, pp. 56-115.
Boids. Computer simulation
viewable as a java applet:
http://www.hmt.com/cwr/boids.html.
Radford,
Andrew (1988). Transformational Grammar:
A First Course.
AUTHOR =
{David E. Rumelhart and James L. McClelland},
TITLE = {An Interactive Activation Model of Context Effects in
Letter
Perception: Part 2. The Contextual Enhancement Effect and Some
Tests and
Extensions of the Model},
JOURNAL =
{Psychological Review},
YEAR =
{1982},
VOLUME =
{89},
NUMBER =
{1},
PAGES =
{60--94},
}
Rumelhart, D.~E., McClelland, J.~L., and the PDP
Research~Group (1986).
{\em Parallel Distriubted
Processing. Explorations in the
Microstructure
of Cognition. Volume 1.} MIT
Press,
\bibitem[Selman and Hirst, 1985]{S&H:85}
Selman,
B. and Hirst, G. (1985).
A
rule-based connectionist parsing system.
In {\em Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Conference of the
Cognitive
Science
Society}, pages 212--221. {}.
\bibitem[Smolensky, 1988]{Smolensky:88}
Smolensky, P. (1988).
On
the proper treatment of connectionism.
{\em B.B.S.}, 11(1):1--74.
Spivey-Knowlton,
M. and Sedivy, J.~C. (1995).
Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints , Cognition (55)3 (1995) pp.
227-267
Competition
and recency in a hybrid network model of syntactic
disambiguation. {\em Journal of Psycholinguistic Research}, 23(4):295--322.
\bibitem[Swinney, 1979]{Swinney:79}
Swinney, D.~A. (1979).
Lexical access
during sentence comprehension: (re)consideration of
context effects.
{\em Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior},
18:645--660.
The
gradual development of degree modifier {\em sort of}:
A corpus
proximity model. In Beals, K., Cooke, G., Kathman,
D., McCullough, K.-E., Kita, S.,
and Testen, D., editors, {\em
Proceedings of the 29th Regional Meeting of the
Syntactic
Innovation: A Connectionist Model. Ph.d. dissertatin, Stanford
University.
Lexical
change as nonlinear interpolation.
In Moore,
J.~D. and Lehman, J.~F., editors, {\em Proceedings of the
17th
Annual Cognitive Science Conference}.
Metrical
relations among analog computers.
Draft version available at
http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/tabor/papers.html.
Context
free grammar representation in neural networks.
Draft version available at
http://simon.cs.cornell.edu/home/tabor/papers.html.
Tabor, W. (in
press). Fractal
Encoding of Context Free Grammars in Connectionist Networks. Expert
Systems: the
International
Journal of Knowledge Engineering and Neural Networks.
Tabor,
W., Galantucci, B.,
& Richardson, D. (submitted). Self-organization in
sentence processing. Manuscript, Department of Psychology,
Tabor, W., Juliano, C., and Tanenhaus, M.
(1997).
Parsing in
a dynamical system: An attractor-based account of the
interaction of lexical and
structural constraints in sentence processing.
Language
and Cognitive Processes, 12(2/3):211--271.
Tabor, W.,
Spivey, M., and Richardson, D.~C. (in prep.).
Grammatical
insurgence as evidence for distributed organization in
the language
processor. Manuscript,
Tabor, W. & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1999). Dynamical models of sentence processing. Cognitive
Science 23(4), 491-515.
\bibitem[Tabossi et~al., 1987]{T&C&J:87}
Tabossi, P., Columbo, L., and Job, R. (1987).
Accessing
lexical ambiguity: effects of context and dominance.
{\em Psychological Research}, 49(2--3):161--167.
Tanenhaus, M., Carlson, G., and Trueswell, J.
(1989).
The
role of thematic structures in interpretation and parsing.
{\em Language and Cognitive Processes}, 4(3--4):SI211--SI234.
Tanenhaus, M.~K., Leiman,
J.~M., and Seidenberg, M.~S. (1979).
Evidence
for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in
syntactic contexts.
{\em Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior},
18:427--440.
Tanenhaus, M.K., Spivey-Knowlton, M.J., & Hanna,
J.E. (in press). Modeling thematic
and
discourse context effects
within a multiple constraints framework: Implications for the
architecture of the language
comprehension system. In M. Crocker et al. (Eds.), Architectures and
Mechanisms
for Language Processing.
Loc: Babbidge Library QA76.9.N38
A76 2000
Tanenhaus, M.~K. and Trueswell, J.~C. (1995). Sentence comprehension. In Miller, J. and Eimas,
P., editors, Handbook of Perception and Cognition: Volume 11, pages 217--262.
Academic Press,
Trueswell, J.C. (1996). The role of lexical frequency in
syntactic ambiguity
resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 566-585.
Trueswell,
J.C., Tanenhaus, M.K. & Garnsey,
S.M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing:
Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity
resolution. Journal of Memory
and Language, 33, 285-318.
Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., and Kello, C.
(1993).
Verb-specific
constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects
of lexical preference
from garden paths.
Journal of
Experimental Psychology, 19(3):528--553.
Turvey, M. T. and Shaw, R. E. (1995).
Toward
an ecological physics and a physical psychology. In Solso, R. and
Massaro, D. The Science of the
Mind: 2001 and Beyond, pages 144-169.
van Gelder, T. (to appear).
The
dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science.
Target
article in {\em Behavioral and Brain Sciences.}
"Unrestricted
Race". Poster presented at the 1998 CUNY conference.
von Foerster
H. (1960). On
Self-Organizing Systems
and
their Environments. In: Self-Organizing
Systems,
Yovitts
M.C. & Cameron S. (eds.), Pergamon, New
Wiles,
J. and Elman, J. (1995).
Landscapes
in recurrent networks.
In Moore,
J.~D. and Lehman, J.~F., editors, {\em Proceedings of the
17th
Annual Cognitive Science Conference}.
@ARTICLE{Kelso84:fsacfjp,
AUTHOR =
"J. A. S. Kelso and B. Tuller
and E. Vatikiotis-Bateson and C. A. Fowler",
TITLE =
"Functionally specific articulatory
cooperation following jaw
perturbations during speech:
Evidence for coordinative structures",
JOURNAL =
"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance",
YEAR = "1984",
VOLUME =
"10",
pages =
"812--832",
}
@ARTICLE{Gilden1995:1/fnihc,
AUTHOR = {D.L. Gilden and T. Thornton and M.W. Mallon},
TITLE = {1/f Noise in Human Cognition},
JOURNAL = {Science},
YEAR = {1995},
VOLUME = {267},
NUMBER = {5205},
PAGES = {1837-1839},
}
@ARTICLE{vanOrden03:soocp,
AUTHOR = {Guy C. {Van
Orden} and John G. Holden and Michael T.
Turvey},
TITLE = {Self-Organization of Cognitive
Performance},
JOURNAL = {Journal
of Experimental Psychology: General},
YEAR = {2003},
VOLUME = {132},
NUMBER = {3},
PAGES = {331-350},
}
@ARTICLE{Wagenmakers05:hcaapos,
AUTHOR =
"Eric-Jan Wagenmakers and Simon Farrell
and Roger Ratcliff",
TITLE =
"Human Cognition and a Pile of Sand: A Discussion on Serial
Correlations
and Self-Organized
Criticality",
JOURNAL =
"Journal
of Experimental Psychology: General",
YEAR =
"2005",
volume = "134",
number = "1",
pages = "108--116",
}
@ARTICLE{vanOrden05:hca1/fs,
AUTHOR = {Guy C. {Van Orden}
and John G. Holden and Michael T. Turvey},
TITLE = {Human Cognition and 1/f Scaling},
JOURNAL = {Journal
of Experimental Psychology: General},
YEAR = {2005},
VOLUME = {134},
NUMBER = {1},
PAGES = {117--123},
}