Zoogeography
- I. Principles, definitions, processes
- Study of bio/zoogeography
- Two goals:
- Delineation and characterization of faunal areas
- Determine the evolutionary history of these faunas, in geographical context
- Distribution of taxa in space explained by:
- Historical factors: evolutionary origin of taxon on one part of planet, subsequent spread of that taxon over evolutionary time can be explored
- Ecological factors: distribution of abiotic (habitat variables: climate, etc) and biotic (predators, competitors) can explain distribution of organisms
- Will focus for today on historical zoogeography
- Types of distributions
- Endemic: found only in a particular region. Hawaii, Bermuda have many endemic fishes. Can be endemic to island, ocean, continent.
- Circumglobal, circumtropical: widely distributed across globe or throughout tropics. Particularly true of epipelagic fishes, e.g. many oceanic tuna, billfishes
- Antitropical: group absent from tropics but present at higher latitudes, both sides. Can be an individual species, e.g. Scomber japonicus; can refer to a higher taxon e.g. a genus, family
- Historical processes influencing distributions
- Dispersal
- Present or ancient distribution occurs in multiple places bkz group moved into areas it didn’t originally occur in.
- Center of origin of group; as group spreads, there is further cladogenesis
- Ancestral group in center or pushed out to edges?
- Freshwater fish may disperse:
- freshwater or overland dispersal:
- rivers change course
- stream capture, as headwater erosion cuts through watershed boundary
- primary freshwater fishes are groups strictly confined to fw
- dispersal via marine waters
- secondary freshwater fishes are usually limited to freshwater but occasional individuals or species may be estuarine or marine;
- peripheral fishes have evolved fw lifestyle from marine group, or migrate between (diadromy)
- Example: Plotosid catfishes; marine group that has secondarily invaded fw in Australia, new guinea. Secondary or peripheral?
- freshwater fishes on isolated oceanic islands are secondary or peripheral
- Marine fish can certainly disperse
- Dispersal involves random events, acting on individual taxa
- Vicariance
- barrier divides a distribution; division followed by allopatric speciation, perhaps to further cladogenesis.
- Present or ancient distribution occurs in multiple places because group was present before places were isolated.
- For terrestrial and freshwater organisms, continental drift is major vicariant event.
- for marine organisms,
- spreading of sea basin; isolation by distance
- formation of isthmus of Panama isolated w. atlantic from e. pacific, cutting species in two.
- Events likely to occur to many taxa
- Competing ideas
- These are two basic models for how distributions arise
- Both likely to be required for full explanation of any taxon; but lively debate on relative importance
- Classically, explanations were dispersalist
- Relatively modern evidence for continental drift gave life to vicariant hypotheses
- Modern methods used in analyzing processes:
- seek common patterns of distribution by comparing phylogenies and distributions for diverse taxa
- Determine distribution of taxon and subtaxa
- Determine phylogeny for group
- Repeat for other taxa in same areas
- If possible, also develop an 'area cladogram' based on known geological history: e.g., Australia, Africa and South America
- Fossils can be very useful; paleodistribution, and establishing a minimum age
One example: the fishes of Africa and S. America
Large number of shared taxa (table, Lundberg)
Given a hypothetical clade, C, made up of C1 and C2, on different continents. Four possible models for this distribution (schematic)
- Simple drift/vicariance
Drift followed by allopatric speciation
- Pre-drift intercontinental speciation
divergence prior to drift
- Post drift dispersal
divergence following dispersal
- Indirect dispersal
common ancestor isn't present on either continent
Geological evidence for split between continents
Sometime between 106 and 84 Ma; mid-Cretaceous
Lungfishes: support drift/vicariance model
- Well supported phylogeny (fig 8.2, Lundberg)
- fossil neoceratodontid from early Cretaceous; so ancestral lepidosirenid, as sister taxon, originated before drift.
- rules out model 3
- subsequent fossils of two genera limited to current continental ranges and earliest is late Cretaceous
- rules out model 2
- Marine dispersal for lungfishes out of the question
- rules out model 1
Arapaimidae supports pre-drift speciation model
Two fossils: Aptian (110 Ma) age of L. indicates that split between Arapaima and Heterotis occurred before drift
- indicates model 2 over vicariance
Bottom line; diversification of freshwater fauna on these two continents cannot be explained by one geological event.
North American freshwater fish zoogeography
Relict fishes
- Several ancient fish families present here
- Pangaea (ca. 200 Ma) dominated by early actinopterygii (chondrosteans, holosteans) and sarcopterygii. (fig. 1.1, p 5 Hocutt and Wiley)
- Gars and bowfins: Jurassic in origin (check Nelson) and probably widespread, now present only here
- Polyodontidae, Hiodontidae: Asian-Namerican distribution. In late Cretaceous, one unified northern continent (fig 1.5 Hocutt and Wiley, p 7).
Ostariophysans
- Gondwanaland, in Jurassic (prior to fig. 1.2, p 5 h&w) dominated by ostariophysans. Origin in western part, Africa/South America.
- Diversification of catfishes and characins in Jurassic and Cretaceous
- Ictaluridae (endemic family): catfishes invaded Eurasia and N America in Cretaceous. Ictalurid fossils from beginning of Cenozoic. Closely related to Asian African bagrids, so invasion from Asia.
- Catastomidae: (fig. 3-4, p. 607 bond): late arrival. N American fossils mid-Eocene.
- Cyprinidae (fig. 30-5, p. 609 bond). Earliest fossils in Asia, Eocene. Earliest fossils in Europe and N america are Oligocene. Persistent land bridge in Beringia may have permitted invasion, 32 ma. Even later invasion of Africa
Zoogeography of the northeast
- Diversity in the area is pretty low; certainly relative to the Mississippi drainage basin
- Why? Pleistocene glaciation (fig 30-7, p. 611 Bond)
- Completely cleared the area of fish (fig 5.2 in Hocutt and Wiley 1986, p 142)
- Refugia
There were several places that continued to have fish throughout. Obviously, down south; also some unlikely places, such as a spot off the Georges Banks.
- Dispersal
Once glaciers retreated, the fishes in the refugia recolonized our area.